Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Martin Beran Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs M. Beran

Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
29
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
84
C. Rank
Ret.
22
Best Rank
706
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$3.7M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Martin Beran
CAN
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
29
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
84
C. Rank
Ret.
22
Best Rank
706
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$3.7M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-To-Head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Beran
They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Martin Beran winning 0. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Martin Beran was at the Netherlands F6 (Rotterdam), 23-08-2017, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Zandschulp | 1 |
Beran | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R2) Netherlands F6 (Rotterdam)(08-23-17)
Botic Van De Zandschulp
6
6
Martin Beran
2
2
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Beran H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$3,676,420 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
61.17% (378-240) | Career Total W/L | 52.38% (121-110) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
7 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
45.16% (14-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Beran Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 42.02% of points on their second serve, while Martin Beran has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Martin Beran has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 54.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martin Beran has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 31/ 31), with Martin Beran winning 0% (W/L 31/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15). Martin Beran has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 61/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 14/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17), where as Martin Beran has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1 times and Martin Beran being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Martin Beran winning 0. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Martin Beran was at the Netherlands F6 (Rotterdam), 23-08-2017, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 140.92 while Martin Beran has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martin Beran has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 34.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martin Beran has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Martin Beran Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Beran H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:3:0 | Avg. Match Time | 1:3:0 |
68% (28/41) | 1st Serve % | 67% (37/55) |
75% (21/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (20/37) |
69% (9/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (5/18) |
50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
55% (30/55) | Return Pts Won % | 27% (11/41) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Zandschulp 47%, Beran 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Zandschulp 51%, Beran 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Zandschulp 57%, Beran 0%.
B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
M. Beran Recent Matches Played

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Beran Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61.17% (378/240) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.38% (121/110) |
58.06% (864/624) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.04% (279/247) |
53.03% (7473/6618) | Games Win/Loss | 51.65% (2513/2352) |
58.27% (74/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.46% (61/51) |
61.59% (178/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.56% (41/37) |
65.14% (114/61) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.34% (19/22) |
44.44% (12/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
3039 | Aces Total | 464 |
0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
2260 | Total Double Faults | 326 |
1:36:41 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
391.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.46 |
62% (25341/41153) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4202/6465) |
72% (18139/25341) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2849/4202) |
48% (7602/15815) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1116/2263) |
43% (1866/4337) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (213/560) |
41% (17267/42509) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2379/6329) |
58.93% (33/23) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
49.06% (26/27) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
60.00% (12/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
51.70% (76/71) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
63.33% (76/44) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
69.82% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 53.07% (121/107) |
62% (350/562) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (120/229) |
49% (21/43) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
53% (105/197) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (25/53) |
57% (116/203) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (28/66) |
89% (355/316) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (131/108) |
11% (355/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (131/23) |
23% (261/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (100/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 30/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.48
W2
1.49
10:00 AM 30/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.37
W2
2.9
07:00 AM 01/10/25
Prediction
W1
1.58
W2
2.38
10:30 AM 30/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.48
W2
2.5
11:00 AM 30/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.179
W2
4.4
07:00 AM 01/10/25
Prediction
W1
1.9
W2
1.9
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Zandschulp (Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai)
Shang vs ZandschulpCould play in The Third
Kovacevic vs ZandschulpCould play in The Third
Khachanov vs ZandschulpCould play in The Third
Zandschulp vs TsitsipasCould play in The Second
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
06:00
H2H 2-3
06:00
H2H 1-3
11:00
H2H 2-1
05:00
H2H 0-2
07:00
H2H 1-1
Tennis Events This Week
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai
China
China Open - Beijing
China
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo
Japan
Antofagasta Challenger
Chile
Braga Challenger
Portugal
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger
France
Tiburon Challenger
United States
Villena Challenger
Spain
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kayseri
Turkey
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Perth
Australia
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy
M25 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt